diff --git a/bib.bib b/bib.bib index fff29fc..05d2173 100644 --- a/bib.bib +++ b/bib.bib @@ -1494,7 +1494,7 @@ @thesis{Harasta2013, type = {phdthesis}, title = {In search of a single voice: The politics of form, use and belief in the Kernewek language}, - author = {Harasta, Jesse Owen}, + author = {Harasta, Jesse}, date = {2013}, institution = {Syracuse University}, abstract = {This dissertation is based upon fieldwork performed between 2007 and 2011 in Cornwall, a region of Southwestern Britain notable for its ambiguous ethnic identity -- caught between England and the Celtic nations -- and its unique, revived Celtic language, Kernewek. During the course of the research, work focused upon the role of the language revival movement as a tool for ethnic identification: hardening boundaries, shoring up faltering communities and nationalist purification. However, the language movement is divided into three primary factions, which take differing approaches to the language, and to their corresponding language ideology based upon their relationship to Cornish identity. These relationships are based upon speakers' sense of ethnic self as formed through class, kinship, linguistic self-perception, religious and political affiliations and place of birth and childhood. However, since the 2006 recognition of the language by the British states, all of these debates have become intensified due to pressure to standardize. This study examines specific examples including: teaching materials and pedagogical approaches in the language, debates over the minutiae of spelling, aesthetic sensibilities, and practices of the naming and renaming of people and places.}, @@ -1504,7 +1504,7 @@ @article{Harasta2017, title = {``Because they are Cornish'': Four uses of a useless language}, - author = {Harasta, sse}, + author = {Harasta, Jesse}, date = {2017}, journaltitle = {Heritage Language Journal}, volume = {14}, @@ -1762,15 +1762,6 @@ file = {C:\Users\3055822\OneDrive - Queen's University Belfast\readings\hut 2001.pdf} } -@book{Hut2001a, - title = {Cornish: The Cornish language in education in the UK}, - author = {Hut, F.}, - date = {2001}, - publisher = {Mercator}, - location = {Leeuwarden}, - keywords = {corn:pol,cornish} -} - @incollection{Insley2020, title = {Languages of boundaries and boundaries of language in Cornish charters}, booktitle = {The languages of early medieval charters}, diff --git a/bibliography.pdf b/bibliography.pdf index 4144890..fa9714b 100644 Binary files a/bibliography.pdf and b/bibliography.pdf differ diff --git a/bibliography.tex b/bibliography.tex index c4b4df4..0cf9409 100644 --- a/bibliography.tex +++ b/bibliography.tex @@ -144,8 +144,9 @@ urlseen={Accessed}, \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc,title={Cornwall and Brittany},keyword=corn:bret] -\printbibliography[heading=bibintoc,title={A selection of non-language-focused - works},keyword=corn:nonling] +% \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc,title={A selection of non-language-focused +% works},keyword=corn:nonling] %% too piecemeal? what are the +% criteria for inclusion in this section? \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc,title={Works I have not seen, but which are cited in earlier issues of \textit{The year's work in modern language studies}},keyword=corn:unsorted]